Evolution Hoax

Towards An End To The Flores Man Deception

On 23 May, 2006, the Ntvmsnbc.com news portal carried a report headed “Debate over the truth of the Hobbit.” The report contained the latest study regarding Homo floresiensis, nicknamed the “hobbit” (*) by the media, and some views concerning it.

Another evolutionist propaganda storm is coming to an end in the face of contradictory evidence and increasing objections.

On 23 May, 2006, the Ntvmsnbc.com news portal carried a report headed “Debate over the truth of the Hobbit.” The report contained the latest study regarding Homo floresiensis, nicknamed the “hobbit” (*) by the media, and some views concerning it.

Readers will recall that Homo floresiensis, discovered in the cave of Liang Bua on the Indonesian island of Flores in 2003, stirred up considerable reaction in both the media and the scientific world, even being described as a “revolution in anthropology.” It was estimated that the bones unearthed belonged to eight individuals and dated back between 95,000-12.000 years. The feature that made Flores man the subject of such great interest was its small brain volume and short stature. Scientists calculated that these human beings were around 1 metre (3 feet) tall with a brain approximately 400 cubic centimetres (24 cubic inches) in size (comparable to a grapefruit).

The Ntvmsnbc.com report concerned the latest developments in the debate over the factor leading to such small brain dimensions. It described the latest developments in these terms:

“It was suggested that the skeletons belonging to the hominid Hobbit discovered on the Indonesian island of Flores in 2003 in fact belonged to native peoples living in the region … It is suggested that the skeletons, believed to belong to a hominid known as the Hobbit, belonged to a human being with a genetic disease. The Hobbit skeleton found on the island of Flores attracted great interest from the scientific world. It is estimated that the dwarfish human known as Homo floresiensis lived isolated in the island jungle, far from other people, until the 1900s.” (http://ntvmsnbc.com/news/373813.asp)

These developments are important as confirming a point we have been raising on our website since the very outset: The claim that Flores Man represents a separate species is a deception resorted to in the light of the need to keep the theory of evolution alive. The “species” division inferred from the bones is a veil with which evolutionists seek to pull the wool over society’s eyes and is based on no scientific criteria permitting any claim of objectivity.

The details of these new developments are considered below, and the collapse of the evolutionist propaganda regarding Flores Man is demonstrated. Before that, however, a brief look at the debate over Homo floresiensis’s small brain volume and body dimensions, and the parties involved, will not go amiss.

The scientists who made and reported the discovery described Flores Man as a species distinct from Homo sapiens on the basis of its comparatively small dimensions. According to this totally imaginary claim, Flores Man was one of the descendants of Homo erectus and had emerged as a separate species by being isolated and shrinking in size on the island of Flores. Other scientists subsequently later opposed this view, objecting that Flores Man was actually a sub-species of Homo sapiens, in other words an ancient race of human beings, and that those small dimensions stemmed from the disease microcephaly (1, 2, 3). According to this view, these people’s brains had failed to develop as the result of a genetic impairment, remaining very small. Since microcephaly is a genetic disorder that is more prevalent in isolated populations it was understandable that short stature should be observed in all the Flores specimens belonging to eight individuals.

A team led by the Florida State University anthropologist Dean Falk, one of the proponents of the separate species claim, conducted a study in the face of this development and sought to object to the microcephalic explanation. The team compared the Homo floresiensis skull with those of great apes, Homo erectus (For further information, please visit http://www.darwinism-watch.com/darwinist_prop_1_homoerectus.php ) , Homo sapiens (For further information, please visit http://darwinismrefuted.com/origin_of_man_07.html ), Australopithecus africanus (For further information, http://darwinismrefuted.com/origin_of_man_02.html ) and Paranthropus aethiopicus, a pygmy and a microcephalic human and claimed that Homo floresiensis’s small skull size was not the result of microcephaly and that it was a distinct species from Homo sapiens. (Dean Falk et al., “The Brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis”, Science, Vol. 308. no. 5719, 3 March 2005, pp. 242 – 245)
 
The response of Martin’s team to Falk’s team:

The developments referred to on Ntvmsnbc.com concern a technical response to Falk and her team by another team led by the Field Museum of Chicago primatologist Robert D. Martin in the 19 May, 2006, edition of the prestigious scientific journal Science. In the paper in question, Martin and his team published a technical analysis concerning Homo floresiensis (Flores Man). (Robert D. Martin et al., Comment on "The Brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis", Science, Vol. 312. no. 5776, 19 May 2006, p. 999) Martin and his supporters put forward evidence from comparative anatomy to the effect that the small brain size of Flores Man can be explained in terms of the microcephaly seen in today’s human beings, as well as revealing weaknesses and deficiencies in Falk’s research. Falk, whose claims had thus been undermined, described the criticisms as superficial, but was unable to provide any concrete response to them. (Dean Falk et al., “Response to Comment on "The Brain of LB1, Homo floresiensis", Science, Vol. 312. no. 5776, 19 May 2006, p. 999)

Martin and his team wrote the following in the summary section of their article that demolished Falk’s results:

Endocast analysis of the brain Homo floresiensis by Falk etal. (Reports, 8 April 2005, p. 242) implies that the hominid is an insular dwarf derived from H. erectus, but its tiny cranial capacity cannot result from normal dwarfing. Consideration of more appropriate microcephalic syndromes and specimens supports the hypothesis of modern human microcephaly. (Robert D. Martin et al, ibid.)

In their paper, the research team showed that the island dwarfism parameters seen in mammals in particular excluded Homo floresiensis. To put it another way, the small brain and body dimensions of Homo floresiensis  were not of a level that could result from island dwarfism.

Responses to the dwarfism claim

It is a known fact that mammal species living on islands are smaller than their counterparts living on the mainland. During this process, living things separated from the mainland population due to geographic isolation gradually become physically smaller on account of the restricted food resources available. Various fossils obtained on islands constitute excellent examples of this. For example, fossils of elephants a mere 1 metre in height have been uncovered on islands such as Sicily and Malta, and it has been estimated that these were stuck on the islands and separated from elephants 4 metres in height, and shrank in size in as little as 5,000 years. (Lister A., et al. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, 69. 277 - 292 (1996); Marta Mirazon Lahr & Robert Foley, "Human evolution writ small", 27 October 2004, http://www.nature.com/news/2004/041025/full/4311043a.html) (This “dwarfism” is not “evolution,” of course. Because a living thing exposed to dwarfism does not acquire new, genetically based features. In the same way that a pocket radio developed by engineers has merely been reduced in size and acquires no new technology, of the kind that might turn it into a television, for instance, so a living thing exposed to dwarfism has not undergone evolution.)

In addition, island dwarfism exhibits certain average parameters. The levels of brain and body shrinkage are more or less fixed, and the body decreases in size relatively more than the brain. Ann MacLarnon from Roehampton University, a member of Martin’s team, modelled the dwarfism forms of various mammals, from dogs to elephants and compared them with the human beings. Based on these data, the scientists emphasize that the skeleton brain is very small for a dwarf hominid; so much so, in fact, they state that a brain volume of 400 cc could only occur in a person 30 cm tall. MacLarnon also states that a dwarf Homo erectus would be expected to weigh a mere 2 kilograms, and that this is at least one-tenth less than the actual Hobbit must have weighed. (Adrian Barnett, “New Research suggests "hobbit" was not a new species”, New Scientist News Service, 18 May 2006, http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9190-new-research-suggests-hobbit-was-not-a-new-species.html)

In addition, the existence of such short people is not actually all that surprising. As we know from pygmies, human tribes with very short stature are still living today. Moreover, according to the Guinness Book of Records website, the American Tamara de Treaux is only 77 cm (2 ft 7 in) tall. Another very short individual is Weng Wang from the Philippines, at 83 cm (2 ft 9 in). (Carl Wieland, "Soggy dwarf bones", http://answersingenesis.org/docs2004/1028dwarf.asp )

If several people of that height were to die on an island, and if palaeontologists of the distant future were to unearth those people’s fossil bones and then attempt to describe them as a separate species, they would of course be making a mistake. Evolutionists’ separate species error regarding Flores Man is of just such a kind.

The deficiencies in Falk’s research

In addition, Martin and his team showed that Falk’s research was unreliable, because the sole microcephalic specimen employed by Falk belonged to a child who had died at the age of 10. However, the Homo floresiensis skull is known to have belonged to an adult aged around 30. The deficiency in Falk’s comparison lies in the use of microcephalic specimens very different in terms of age and very few in number.

In contrast, Martin and his team examined a larger number of skulls that also included adult specimens. Furthermore, the skull used by Falk was not the original, but was based on a plaster model. Moreover, the model’s top region did not exactly fit the other areas and was made from separate plaster. (Robert D. Martin et al, ibid.) This also damaged the reliability of Falk’s comparison.

Homo floresiensis: A modern human race

Martin and his team’s research reveals that Flores Man is not a distinct species from today’s human being, but a human race subjected to microcephaly. Therefore, giving it the name Homo floresiensis is a biased choice made in the light of evolutionists’ preconceptions and of the needs of the theory of evolution. Flores Man is a variation of Homo sapiens. In addition, this is nothing new. The Indonesian anthropologist Teuku Jacob Flores, director of the Institute of Palaeoanthropology at Gadjah Mada University, made this clear in a statement issued shortly after the publication of the Flores discovery:

It is not a new species. It is a sub-species of Homo sapiens classified under the Australomelanesid race. If it’s not a new species, why should it be given a new name? 
("Indonesian scientist says Flores hominid not new species", AFP Science by Yahoo, http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1539&e=3&u=/afp/20041106/sc_afp/indonesia_science_palaeontology_041106133524 )

In fact, the statements reported by ntvmsnbc.com and those in the introduction to the article are parallel ones and show that the objection Jacob made a year ago has spread still further within the scientific community.

Flores Man’s small brain reveals a major problem for the theory of evolution

It is particularly important to state that the small Homo floresiensis brain that evolutionists have adopted as “distinct species” criterion actually leads to results that work against the theory of evolution. Because according to classic evolutionist scenarios, human intelligence should have developed in line with an increase in brain volume. However, Flores Man totally undermines that evolutionist dogma. The question that evolutionists are unable to answer is this: how is it that this supposed hominid, with a brain no bigger than that of a chimpanzee, could have made tools used by Homo sapiens, today’s human being, in that period, and could have used them for hunting animals much larger than themselves?

One can see from statements on the subject by evolutionist authorities that they are confronted by a situation that creates problems and confusion for them. The anthropologist Chris Stringer for example, from London’s Museum of Natural History, expresses his astonishment in these terms:

Here is a creature with a brain the size of a chimpanzee"s, but apparently a tool-maker and hunter, and perhaps descended from the world"s first mariners. Its very existence shows how little we know about human evolution. I could never have imagined a creature like this, living as recently as this. 
("Our not so distant relative", The Guardian, 28 October 2004, http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/story/0,13026,1337198,00.html )

The evolutionist Peter Brown, one of the main figures in the team that discovered the fossils describes the problem that the skull volume poses for their theories thus:

Small stature is easy to accommodate, but small brain size is a bigger problem - it still is. 
("Our not so distant relative", The Guardian, 28 October 2004, http://www.guardian.co.uk/life/feature/story/0,13026,1337198,00.html )

As we have seen, the small Homo floresiensis skull on which evolutionists base their distinct species claim in fact represents a major problem for their own theory. However, evolutionists are oddly attempting to distort this and use it as a propaganda vehicle in their own favor. This, of course, is a dogmatic approach rather than a scientific one.

Evolutionary propaganda has once again been defeated by science

Let us now step back a little while our knowledge about Flores Man is still fresh in our minds and recall the media storm that broke when these findings were first published. In October 2004 many publishing organs gave the impression that the Flores discoveries represented evidence for evolution, interpreting their significance as being “the anthropological discovery of the century” or “a revolution in anthropology.” However, the evolutionist propaganda concerning “the anthropological revolution of the century” soon slowed down during the process of scientific investigation. The “distinct species” claims made regarding the fossils soon became such a matter for debate that just a few months later The Times Online, the Internet edition of The Times and The Sunday Times, summarized the latest developments in these words:

A find heralded as the greatest discovery in anthropology for a century has degenerated into one of its greatest rows. 
(Nigel Hawkes, Professor fuels row over Hobbit man fossils, The Times Online, 3 December 2004)

In fact, the evolution speculation regarding the Flores discoveries lacked any sound scientific analysis right from the outset. Martin, who headed the latest research, drew attention to this by saying,

There has been too much media hype and too little critical scientific evaluation. 
(“Race of tiny people didn’t exist, scientists say”, 18 May 2006, 
http://www.world-science.net/othernews/060518_floresfrm.htm )

The palaeoanthropologist Ian Tattersall also notes this uncertainty:

This is an extraordinarily weird and unexpected thing, and, even now, nobody knows what to do with it. 
(Guy Gugliotta, “Scientists Debate the Normalcy of Ancient "Hobbits"”, The Washington Post, 19 Mayıs 2006, s A12,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/18/AR2006051801301.html?sub=AR)

As can be seen from these comments, another evolutionist propaganda storm is about to come to an end during the process of scientific investigation. Flores Man appears to be about to follow the other fossil species that have been added to the human family tree to great accompanying fanfare but that have later been silently removed in the face of subsequent findings. Evolutionist claims propounded as if they were irrefutable scientific facts can be seen to consist of illusory speculation nourished by ideological fervor.

Conclusion: Evolution preconceptions must not be allowed to pose an obstacle to science

Flores Man, with its small brain volume and body, is of course a most astonishing discovery. However, scientists investigating the factors that led to these characteristics must remain scientifically objective and include all possible explanations in their evaluations. It is clear that describing Flores Man as a distinct species even though its small brain volume can be explained within the framework of a well known disorder such as microcephaly, of which many examples exist, by completely ignoring this possibility, is a far cry from objectivity. An attitude that blindly accepts prejudiced interpretations instead of an analysis that includes all possible alternatives cannot, of course, be maintained in the face of the scientific facts and critical examinations. The latest research that has revealed the deficiencies and weaknesses of the distinct species claim is an excellent example of this. Evolutionists, who hastily interpreted the findings as belonging to a separate species, are once again mistaken and have placed themselves in a very difficult position.

So long as evolutionists put their preconceptions ahead of science such errors will never end, and they will keep on exhibiting behavior that only serves to show how their theories are an ideology that is defended  dogmatically.

We congratulate the Ntvmsnbc.com news service for reporting developments that contradict evolutionist hypotheses in this story, and hope that this will become a matter of policy.

[*] Flores Man has been nicknamed the “Hobbit” by the media

2006-05-23 00:00:00

Harun Yahya's Influences | Presentations | Audio Books | Interactive CDs | Conferences| About this site | Make your homepage | Add to favorites | RSS Feed
All materials can be copied, printed and distributed by referring to author “Mr. Adnan Oktar”.
(c) All publication rights of the personal photos of Mr. Adnan Oktar that are present in our website and in all other Harun Yahya works belong to Global Publication Ltd. Co. They cannot be used or published without prior consent even if used partially.
© 1994 Harun Yahya. www.harunyahya.com - info@harunyahya.com
page_top
iddialaracevap.com adnanoktarhaber.com adnanoktarhukuk.com adnanoktargercekleri.net
YENİ ŞAFAK GAZETESİ YAZARI SAYIN HASAN ÖZTÜRK’E AÇIK MEKTUP
SAYIN ÖZLEM GÜRSES'E AÇIK MEKTUP
SAYIN MİNE UZUN'A AÇIK MEKTUP
HUSUMETLİ ÇEVRELER TARAFINDAN AVUKATLARIMIZA YÖNELİK SÜRDÜRÜLEN YOĞUN...
DAVA DOSYASI BOMBOŞ ÇIKINCA MEDET UMULAN ESKİ BİR İFTİRA: "GİZLİ TÜNELDEN...
KONUNUN TARAFLARINA SÖZ HAKKI VERMEDEN TEK TARAFLI YAYIN YAPMASI HABERTÜRK...
SAYIN AHMET HAKAN'A AÇIK MEKTUP
HALK TV'YE AÇIK MEKTUP
OZAN SÜER ARKADAŞIMIZIN TUTUKLANMASIYLA İLGİLİ OLARAK AV. SENA AKKAYA...
TÜRK İNSANI ADİL, TARAFSIZ, DÜRÜST, İLKELİ VE SEVGİ DOLU BİR BASIN ÖZLEMİ...
İFTİRA ÜZERİNE KURULAN DAVAMIZIN TEMELİNDEKİ SEBEP: "HUSUMET"
HÜRRİYET GAZETESİ VE YAZARLARINA CESARETLE VE ISRARLA DOĞRUDAN YANA OLMAK...
SEVGİ, KARDEŞLİK VE SELAM GÖNDERME İDDİALARI TUTUKLAMA GEREKÇESİ OLAMAZ
MEHDİYET İNANCI SEBEBİYLE SAYIN ADNAN OKTAR’IN YANINDAN AYRILMADIĞIMIZ...
TOPLU BİR AKIL TUTULMASI: "GALEYAN"
ELVAN KOÇAK BEY’İN YANLIŞ BİLGİLENDİRİLDİĞİ HUSUSLAR
AV. CELAL ÜLGEN'E AÇIK MEKTUP–3
İNGİLİZ DERİN DEVLETİNİN ÜLKEMİZDEKİ ALÇAK, HAİN VE AŞAĞILIK KRİPTO...
SAYIN MİNE KIRIKKANAT HANIMEFENDİ’YE BİR KEZ DAHA DOSTLUK VE SEVGİ...
MÜŞTEKİ İFADELERİ HAKKINDA BASINDA YER ALAN GERÇEK DIŞI HABERLER
SEVGİDEN VAZGEÇMEK ZULÜM OLUR, TEK İSTEĞİMİZ SEVGİ TOPLUMU OLUŞMASI
2 YILDAN BU YANA CAMİAMIZA KARŞI YAPILAN HAK VE HUKUK İHLALLERİ, ZULÜM VE...
ALİ İHSAN KARAHASANOĞLU KARDEŞİMİZ MASUMİYET KARİNESİNE VE SAVUNMA HAKKINA...
ATV KAHVALTI HABERLERİNDEKİ ASILSIZ İTHAMLARA CEVABIMIZDIR
MİLLİ ÇÖZÜM DERGİSİ BAŞYAZARI AHMET AKGÜL’ÜN İFTİRALARA DAYANARAK YAPTIĞI...
SEVGİYE DAİR HER DAVRANIŞIN SUÇ KAPSAMINA SOKULMA GAYRETİNDEN ENDİŞE...
AV. SN. CELAL ÜLGEN'E AÇIK MEKTUP
CÜBBELİ AHMET HOCAMIZ’DAN MÜSLÜMANLAR HAKKINDA KONUŞURKEN ADİL, DÜRÜST VE...
İSTİKLAL İNTERNET HABER SİTESİ YAZARLARINDAN SAYIN ÖMER AKDAĞ’A...
MADDİ GELİR ELDE ETMEK UĞRUNA TERTEMİZ, NUR GİBİ İNSANLARI ACIMASIZCA YOK...
DOSYAMIZDA ETKİN PİŞMANLIK İFADELERİ DEĞİL, CAN HAVLİYLE KENDİNİ...
SAYIN MİNE KIRIKKANAT HANIMIN SAVUNMA HAKKINI VE DEĞERLİ AVUKATLARI HEDEF...
BASIN KORKU DEĞİL ADALET, DÜRÜSTLÜK VE TARAFSIZLIK ÜZERİNE KURULU YAYIN...
AKİT'TEKİ KARDEŞLERİMİZ YAYINLARINDAKİ HAKARETAMİZ ÜSLUBA KARŞI MUTLAKA...
SN. ADNAN OKTAR DURUŞMALAR BOYUNCA MASKE KULLANMIŞ, GENEL SAĞLIĞIN...
MÜMİN ALLAH’TAN GELEN İŞARETLERİ GÖRÜR VE HAYRA YORAR
KANAL D ANA HABER PROGRAMINI HUKUK VE VİCDAN SINIRLARI İÇİNDE YAYIN...
ARKADAŞIMIZ BÜLENT SEZGİN'DEN SAYIN AYŞENUR ARSLAN HANIMEFENDİ’YE AÇIK...
SAYIN ADNAN OKTAR VE ARKADAŞLARINI GÜYA TEHLİKELİYMİŞ GİBİ GÖSTERME OYUNU
ARKADAŞIMIZ SERDAR SUPHİ TOGAY'IN MAHKEME İFADESİNDEN BASINA YANSIYAN...
SÖZDE ETKİN PİŞMAN OLMAK ZORUNDA BIRAKILAN ARKADAŞIMIZ ALİ ŞEREF GİDER’İN...
TURNİKE İFTİRASINA İTİBAR EDİP DİLE GETİRENLERİN ASIL ÖNCELİĞİ...
AKİT CAMİASINDAKİ KARDEŞLERİMİZ BİZİM İYİ NİYETİMİZİ YAKINDAN BİLİR VE...
GERÇEKLER SAYIN DOĞAN KASADOLU'NUN HAYAL DÜNYASINDA YAŞADIĞINDAN VE...
ALİ İHSAN KARAHASANOĞLU KARDEŞİMİZE HANIMLAR HAKKINDA SAYGILI VE NEZAKETLİ...
MUHAFAZAKAR CAMİADA HAKKIMIZDA MERAK EDİLEN BAZI SORULARA CEVAPLAR
DURUŞMADA YÖNELTİLEN SORULAR İDDİANAMEDE YER ALAN SUÇLAMALARIN ASILSIZ...
ARKADAŞIMIZ SEDAT ALTAN'DAN DEĞERLİ GAZETECİMİZ SAYIN AHMET HAKAN'A AÇIK...
ARKADAŞIMIZ MERVE BÜYÜKBAYRAK'IN MİNE KIRIKKANAT HANIMEFENDİ'YE AÇIK...
ARKADAŞIMIZ KARTAL İŞ'TEN SAYIN DOĞU PERİNÇEK’E AÇIK MEKTUP
AV. SN. KEREM ALTIPARMAK’IN “İNTERNET ERİŞİM ENGELLERİ VE İFADE ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ”...
"NİHAYET DERGİSİ"NDE, CAMİAMIZ HAKKINDA YAPILMIŞ GERÇEK DIŞI, ÇİRKİN BİR...
HALKI, HALKA EZDİREN SİSTEM SON BULMALI
KONU DEKOLTE DEĞİL, SEVGİMİZE VE DOSTLUĞUMUZA DUYULAN ÖFKE
INDEPENDENT-TÜRKÇE'NİN MÜSLÜMANLARA EVRİM TEORİSİNİ KABUL ETTİRME TAKTİĞİ
BUGÜN BAZI GAZETECİLERİN TUTUKLANMASINI ELEŞTİREN CNN TÜRK GECE GÖRÜŞÜ...
DEKOLTE GİYDİLER DİYE MASUM İNSANLARA YÜZLERCE YIL HAPİS CEZASI İSTEYİP...
SN. ADNAN OKTAR’IN MEHDİLİK İLAN EDEREK DEVLETİ ELE GEÇİRECEĞİ İTHAMI AKLA...
ARKADAŞIMIZ EMRE BUKAĞILI'NIN SN. FAZIL SAYIN AÇIKLAMALARINA CEVABI
SÜLEYMAN ÖZIŞIK KARDEŞİMİZİN DE CEMAATLERİN MİLLETİMİZ İÇİN DEĞERİNİ ÇOK...
ADNAN OKTAR OLMASAYDI...
SAYIN ERGUN YILDIRIM’IN “YENİ MEHDİLER” BAŞLIKLI KÖŞE YAZISINA...
NORMAL VE LEGAL BİR YAŞAMDAN YAPAY SUÇLAR ÜRETİLEREK "HAYALİ BİR SUÇ...
SAYIN ADNAN OKTAR’IN TUTUKLANMASININ ARDINDAN...
CÜBBELİ AHMET HOCAMIZ MÜSLÜMANLARA ATILAN İFTİRALARA İTİBAR ETMEMELİDİR
ODATV GENEL YAYIN YÖNETMENİ SN. BARIŞ PEHLİVAN'A AÇIK MEKTUP
KOMPLOCULAR, KORKUTARAK "SÖZDE" İTİRAFÇI YAPTIKLARI ARKADAŞLARIMIZ...
CUMHURİYET GAZETESİNE AÇIK MEKTUP
GENİŞ HAYAL GÜCÜ İLE KURGULANAN DAVA DOSYASI
MODERNLİK İSLAM’IN GELİŞİP YAYILMASINDA EN ETKİLİ YÖNTEMDİR
SN. ENVER AYSEVER’İN PROGRAMINDA GÜNDEME GELEN İTHAMLARIN CEVAPLARI
SN. ADNAN OKTAR: "ALLAH'IN VERECEĞİ KARARI TALEP EDİYORUM"
MİNE KIRIKKANAT GİBİ AYDIN VE DEMOKRAT BİR HANIMA HUKUKUN TEMEL İLKELERİNE...
Adnan Oktar: "Allah’ın vereceği kararı talep ediyorum."
Adnan Oktar: "Allah’ın vereceği kararı talep ediyorum."
YENİ AKİT GAZETESİ VE ODA TV’DE YER ALAN “UYAP’TAN SANIĞIN ADI SİLİNDİ”...
SAYIN BİRCAN BALİ'YE CEVAP
SAYIN AVUKAT CELAL ÜLGEN'E AÇIK MEKTUP
SAYIN ALİ İHSAN KARAHASANOĞLU'NA CEVAP
SAYIN ADNAN OKTAR VE CAMİAMIZA YÖNELİK MANEVİ LİNÇ
SN. DOĞU PERİNÇEK VE SN. PROF. DR. ALİ DEMİRSOY'UN ÖNEMLİ OLDUĞUNU...
SAYIN PROF. DR. NURAN YILDIZ'A AÇIK MEKTUP
SN. ADNAN OKTAR VE ARKADAŞLARININ İSRAİL VE MUSEVİLERLE OLAN...
CAMİAMIZA YÖNELİK "YURTDIŞI LOBİ FAALİYETLERİ" İSNADI İLE İLGİLİ...
FETÖ'YE KARŞI EN GÜÇLÜ ELEŞTİRİLERİ SN. ADNAN OKTAR YAPMIŞTIR
DELİL VE ŞAHİT OLMADAN SUÇSUZ İNSANLARI CEZALANDIRMAK KUR’AN’A UYGUN...
ARKADAŞLARIMIZ MUAZZEZ VE YILDIZ ARIK’IN DURUŞMADAKİ GERÇEK DIŞI...
İNSANLARA NEREDE VE KİMLERLE YAŞAYACAKLARINA DAİR BASKI VE DAYATMADA...
ARKADAŞIMIZ BERİL KONCAGÜL’ÜN DURUŞMADAKİ GERÇEK DIŞI İDDİALARINA...
KANAL D'NİN UYDURMA HABERİ
MERVE BOZYİĞİT'İN DURUŞMADAKİ AÇIKLAMALARI KUMPASI GÖZLER ÖNÜNE SERDİ !!!
ARKADAŞLARIMIZ ALTUĞ ETİ, BURAK ABACI VE CEYHUN GÖKDOĞAN'IN...
KUMPASÇILARIN ARKADAŞLARIMIZA BASKI VE TEHDİTLE DAYATTIĞI GERÇEK DIŞI...
"NORMAL HAYATIN SUÇMUŞ GİBİ GÖSTERİLMESİ" ANORMALLİĞİ
ARKADAŞIMIZ ÇAĞLA ÇELENLİOĞLU'NUN DURUŞMADAKİ İDDİALARINA CEVABIMIZ
YENİ ŞAFAK VE GÜNEŞ GAZETELERİNDEKİ GERÇEK DIŞI İDDİALARA CEVAP
SAVUNMA HAKKIMIZ NASIL ENGELLENDİ?
ARKADAŞIMIZ ECE KOÇ'UN DURUŞMADAKİ İDDİALARINA CEVABIMIZ
ARKADAŞLARIMIZ MUSTAFA ARULAR VE EMRE TEKER'İN DURUŞMALARINDAKİ...
ARKADAŞIMIZ AYÇA PARS'IN DURUŞMADAKİ İDDİALARINA CEVABIMIZ
KAMU VİCDANI YALANI
DEVLETİMİZİN VERDİĞİ SİLAH RUHSATLARI CAMİAMIZA DUYDUĞU GÜVENİN AÇIK BİR...
ASIL HEDEF İSLAM ALEMİ, TÜRKİYE, SAYIN ERDOĞAN VE AK PARTİ HÜKÜMETİ
GERÇEK MODERNLİK İSLAM DİNİNDEDİR
TV PROGRAMLARINDA SEVGİ DİLİ ESAS ALINMALIDIR
"Allah'tan tahliyemizi istirham ediyorum"
AKİT GRUBUNA AÇIK MEKTUP
"....Allahvar.com sitesi kapatıldı, düşmanım bu siteyi yapmış olsa...
GARDIROP YALANI
SAYIN DOĞU PERİNÇEK'E AÇIK MEKTUP
'CRACKED.COM' SİTESİNDEKİ İDDİALARA CEVAP
1999 KAN KAMPANYASI TAMAMEN MEŞRU VE LEGAL BİR ORGANİZASYONDUR
HARUN YAHYA KÜLLİYATININ İMHASI ÇOK VAHİM VE TARİHİ BİR HATA OLUR
HAKİM VE SAVCILARIMIZ YALNIZCA KANUN, HUKUK VE VİCDANI ESAS ALMALIDIR
DİYANET İŞLERİ BAŞKANLIĞI RAPORUNA CEVAP
İLERİ DERECEDE MODERN GÖRÜNÜM VE DEKOLTE GİYİM TARZININ NEDENLERİ
"Adnan Bey’in çevresindeki her insan hayat dolu, mutlu, cıvıl cıvıl.”
SUÇSUZ BİR GENÇ KIZ DAHA HUKUKSUZ OLARAK TUTUKLANDI
SÖZDE İTİRAFÇI VEYA MÜŞTEKİ OLMAYA ZORLANMIŞ KARDEŞLERİMİZE ACİL KURTULUŞ...
YENİ BİR SAFSATA DAHA
"Müslümanlar Kardeştir..."
"Biz silahlı suç örgütü değiliz"
MEHDİYETİ GÜNDEME GETİRMEK LİNÇ KONUSU OLMAMALI
"Zorla alıkonma, İzole bir hayat yaşama iddialarını asla kabul etiyorum"
"Adnan Bey bizi çok sever, hep onore eder"
MEDYANIN ZORAKİ "BENZERLİK KURMA" TAKTİĞİ
"Ortada silahlı suç örgütü değil sadece birbirini çok seven arkadaş...
AYÇA PARS CANIMIZ GİBİ SEVDİĞİMİZ, MELEK HUYLU, MÜMİNE KARDEŞİMİZDİR
ÇOK DEĞERLİ BİR SİYASİ BÜYÜĞÜMÜZE AÇIK MEKTUP
"ALIKONMA" SAFSATASI
KUMPASÇILARIN KORKUTARAK İFTİRACI DEVŞİRME YÖNTEMLERİ
BERİL KONCAGÜL TEHDİT ALTINDADIR, CAMİAMIZA İFTİRAYA ZORLANMAKTADIR!
TAHLİYE OLAN ARKADAŞLARIMIZ HİÇ KİMSE İÇİN HİÇBİR ZAMAN BİR BASKI UNSURU...
AV. CELAL ÜLGEN ADİL VE DÜRÜST OLMALI
AKİT TV SUNUCUSU CANER KARAER HAKKINDA ÖNEMLİ BİLGİLENDİRME
MASUM İNSANLARIN TAHLİYESİ TAMER KORKMAZ'I DA SEVİNDİRMELİDİR
"Adnan Bey için ailelerimizle arasının iyi olmadığına dair iftiralar...
"Türkiye ve İslam Dünyasını zayıflatmak istiyorlar.."
"Adnan Bey`den ASLA ŞİDDET VE BASKI GÖRMEDİM..."
"Allah rızası için 40 yıldır Türk-İslam Birliği için çabalıyoruz"
"...En ufak bir suça dahi şahit olmadım..."
"Hakkımızda çok fazla SAHTE DELİLLER ÜRETTİLER..."
"Biz FETÖNÜN ANTİSİYİZ...."
“Bu dava sürecinde.... sözde dijital delillerin ibraz edilmemesi gibi pek...
"Zaten biz birbirimizi bu kadar çok sevdiğimiz için buradayız..."
"Biz bir arkadaş grubuyuz..."
"...Biz Vakıf faaliyetlerimiz ile her zaman Devletimizin yanında olduk"
"Biz kimseyle ilgili karalama faaliyeti yapmadık..."
"...Sözde tecavüz için mi buradaki arkadaşlarımla biraraya geleceğim?!"
"...Faaliyetlerimiz herkese hitap ediyor ..."
"Bizim amacımız şatafat içinde yaşamak değil, hiç kimsenin hitap edemediği...
"İnancım gereği ben insanlara yardım ederim"
"Ne yapsa "zorla" diyorlar. Zorla Gülümsüyor, Zorla, Zorla olur mu?"
"Bizim bir arada olma amacımız örgüt kurmak değil. ilmi mücadele...
"Biz birbirimizi Allah için seven.. arkadaşlarız"
"Polisler geldi, hangi eve operasyon yapacağız derlerken, balkona çıkıp...
"Biz örgüt değiliz"
"Devletimizi desteklediğimiz çok hayırlı faaliyetlerimiz var, Bunlar...
"Biz Allah`tan Razıyız Allah da Bizlerden Razı olur inşaAllah"
"İddia edildiği gibi katı bir ortam olsa 40-50 yıl niye kalalım?"
"Neden cömertsin?" diye soruyorlar
"İngiliz Derin Devleti bunu duyunca çıldırdı..."
"Biz Milli değerler etrafında birleşmiş bir sivil toplum kuruluşuyuz"
"Bir imza atıp dışarı çıkmayı ben de bilirim. Ama iftira büyük suçtur."
"Ben varlıklı bir aileden geliyorum, Saat koleksiyonum var"
"Silahlı suç örgütü iddiası tamamen asılsızdır, yalandır, iftiradır."
"Bizim yaptığımız tek şey Allah'ın yaratışını anlatmaktır."
"Almanya'da İslamofobi var, İslam düşmanları var..."
Bir örgüt olsak devlet bizimle faaliyette bulunur mu?
DAVAMIZ METAFİZİKTİR – 2. BÖLÜM
DAVAMIZ METAFİZİKTİR – 1. BÖLÜM
MAHKEME SÜRECİNDE SİLİVRİ CEZAEVİNDE YAŞANAN EZİYET VE ZULÜMLER
"Ben Sayın Adnan Oktar `dan hiçbir zaman Şiddet, Eziyet, Baskı görmedim."
DAVA DOSYASINDAKİ CİNSELLİK KONULU İDDİALAR TÜMÜYLE GEÇERSİZDİR
DURUŞMALARIN İLK HAFTASI
"İNFAK" SUÇ DEĞİL, KURAN'IN FARZ KILDIĞI BİR İBADETTİR
GERÇEK TURNİKE SİSTEMİ GENELEVLERDE
Adnan Oktar davasının ilk duruşması bugün yapıldı.
AVK. UĞUR POYRAZ: "MEDYADA FIRTINA ESTİRİLEREK KAMUOYU ŞARTLANDIRILDI,...
Adnan Oktar'ın itirafçılığa zorlanan arkadaşlarına sosyal medyadan destek...
Adnan Oktar suç örgütü değildir açıklaması.
Adnan Oktar'ın cezaevinden Odatv'ye yazdığı mektubu
Adnan Oktar'dan Cumhurbaşkanı Sayın Recep Tayyip Erdoğan'a mektup
Casuslukla suçlanmışlardı, milli çıktılar.
TBAV çevresinden "Bizler suç örgütü değiliz,kardeşiz" açıklaması
Bu sitelerin ne zararı var!
Adnan Oktar ve arkadaşları 15 Temmuz'da ne yaptılar?
Sibel Yılmaztürk'ün cezaevinden mektubu
İğrenç ve münasebsiz iftiraya ağabey Kenan Oktar'dan açıklama geldi.
Adnan Oktar ve arkadaşlarına Emniyet Müdürlüğü önünde destek ve açıklama...
Adnan Oktar hakkında yapılan sokak röportajında vatandaşların görüşü
Karar gazetesi yazarı Yıldıray Oğur'dan Adnan Oktar operasyonu...
Cumhurbaşkanı Sayın Recep Tayyip Erdoğan'dan Adnan Oktar ile ilgili...
Ahmet Hakan'nın Ceylan Özgül şüphesi.
HarunYahya eserlerinin engellenmesi, yaratılış inancının etkisini kırmayı...
Kedicikler 50bin liraya itirafçı oldu.
Adnan Oktar ve arkadaşlarına yönelik operasyonda silahlar ruhsatlı ve...
FETÖ'cü savcının davayı kapattığı haberi asılsız çıktı.
Adnan Oktar ve arkadaşlarının davasında mali suç yok...
Cemaat ve Vakıfları tedirgin eden haksız operasyon: Adnan Oktar operasyonu...
Tutukluluk süreleri baskı ve zorluk ile işkenceye dönüşüyor.
Adnan Oktar’ın Cezaevi Fotoğrafları Ortaya Çıktı!
"Milyar tane evladım olsa, milyarını ve kendi canımı Adnan Oktar'a feda...
Adnan Oktar davasında baskı ve zorla itirafçılık konusu tartışıldı.
Adnan Oktar ve arkadaşlarının davasında iftiracılık müessesesine dikkat...
Adnan Oktar davasında hukuki açıklama
Adnan Oktar ve Arkadaşlarının Masak Raporlarında Komik rakamlar
Adnan Oktar ve Arkadaşlarının tutukluluk süresi hukuku zedeledi.
Adnan Oktar'ın Museviler ile görüşmesi...
Adnan Oktar ve arkadaşlarına yönelik suçlamalara cevap verilen web sitesi...
Adnan Oktar ve arkadaşlarına karşı İngiliz Derin Devleti hareketi!
Adnan Oktar iddianamesinde yer alan şikayetçi ve mağdurlar baskı altında...
Adnan Oktar iddianamesi hazırlandı.
SAYIN NEDİM ŞENER'E AÇIK MEKTUP
Adnan Oktar ve Nazarbayev gerçeği!
En kolay isnat edilen suç cinsel suçlar Adnan Oktar ve Arkadaşlarına...
Adnan Oktar kaçmamış!
BİR KISIM MEDYA KURULUŞLARINA ÇAĞRI !!!
FİŞLEME SAFSATASI
İSA TATLICAN: BİR HUSUMETLİ PORTRESİ
SİLİVRİ CEZAEVİNDE YAŞANAN İNSAN HAKLARI İHLALLERİ
MÜMİNLERİN YARDIMLAŞMASI VE DAYANIŞMASI ALLAH'IN EMRİDİR
GÜLÜNÇ VE ASILSIZ "KAÇIŞ" YALANI
ABDURRAHMAN DİLİPAK BİLMELİDİR Kİ KURAN’A GÖRE, ZİNA İFTİRASI ATANIN...
YALANLAR BİTMİYOR
SAÇ MODELİ ÜZERİNDEN KARA PROPAGANDA
TAHLİYE EDİLENLERE LİNÇ KAMPANYASI ÇOK YANLIŞ
MEDYA MASALLARI ASPARAGAS ÇIKMAYA DEVAM EDİYOR
Adnan Oktar ve Arkadaşlarının ilk duruşma tarihi belli oldu.
AKİT TV VE YENİ AKİT GAZETESİNE ÖNEMLİ NASİHAT
YAŞAR OKUYAN AĞABEYİMİZE AÇIK MEKTUP
KARA PARA AKLAMA İDDİALARINA CEVAP
Adnan Oktar ve FETÖ bağlantısı olmadığı ortaya çıktı.
TAKVİM GAZETESİNİN ALGI OPERASYONU
Adnan Oktar ve Arkadaşlarına yönelik suçlamaların iftira olduğu anlaşıldı.
"Bizler Suç Örgütü Değiliz..."